Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion

["Michael Fair" <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Doug Royer" <Doug@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3F3AF8A0.1000205@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Michael Fair wrote:
> >>>It doesn't break the uniqueness for a single instance, prove to
> >>>me how there is a conflicting copy of UID:1/RID:1 somewhere in
> >>>the world different than the one I sent?
> >>>
> >>
> >>Then why did you incorrectly guess if the sample I sent was
> >>an update or a new invite to a single instance?
> >
> >
> > Why does it matter?
>
> Your assertion is above = "It doesn't break the uniqueness for a single
> instance...". Yet you were unable to tell the difference - both
> can not be true.

I don't understand this assessment.

If you receive an event with UID: blahblahwoofwoof (whether
that be UID: blahblah/RID:woofwoof or UID:blahblahwoofwoof)
as long as there is only one blahblahwoofwoof in existence
and it is unique.

Why does it matter if the first time you saw blahblahwoofwoof
was an update or its orginal creation?

It is still blahblahwoofwoof, there is only one blahblahwoofwoof
and you end up with the latest copy of it on your calendar.

-- Michael --