[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: CAP-12 - interm version 'A']

It does not change as long as you are changing just instance dates.
It only changes if you change the entire rule.

We were originally discussing changing instance dates.  My response was in that scope.
Note: new email address


Doug Royer <Doug@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: owner-ietf-calendar@xxxxxxxxxxxx

09/07/2003 02:33 PM

Please respond to

Re: [Fwd: CAP-12 - interm version 'A']

Robert_Ransdell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>  > With the RECURRENCE-ID issue you and Robert have changed your mind
>  > several times, yet claim
>  > he is the one that is pig headed. Your so arrogant you will not even
>  > admit that you changed your mind or opinion and you still slam him
>  > with lies and insults. You started the RECURRENCE-ID issue by declaring
>  > that it was fixed forever.  Now you say it changes with the set,
>  > you changed your mind to be mostly compatible with the non-fixed
>  > model, admit it and stop slamming him or anyone simply because
>  > you changed your mind to agree with them.

> We did not change are minds.  The scope of the original discussion was
> changing an instance of a repeat set.
> It was than asked is there ever a case where the recurrence-id's can be
> reset.

Re-read the archives, You declared that it never changed.

You said on May 19:

> I disagree, the recurrence-id must always refer to the original date.
> of the meeting.  Lets say i had a 5 day repeating meeting. However I
invited > you to just Monday Tuesday to start with, but for some reason you
have not
> received the mail yet.
> I now reschedule Thursday Friday to a later time in the day and add you
> to the invitee list.
> You now get a sequence 2 invite for Thursday Friday
> Later you finally receive the meeting for Monday Tuesday with sequence of 1.
> If I allow recurrence dates to reset on a reschedule, I can not tell if the
> Monday Tuesday invitee was rescheduled to Thursday Friday or if this is a
> separate invite.

Now you claim that it changes under some circumstances.
And you have later admitted that because you got the sequence 2 before
the sequence 1 that you would know to do a REFRESH.

Marks comment is on the mark :-)


 Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
 Doug@xxxxxxxxx                 | Office: (208)612-INET
 http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                                |   Cell: (208)520-4044

                We Do Standards - You Need Standards