Re: When to publish -12 - VFREEBUSY

[Doug Royer <Doug@xxxxxxxxx>]

Craig Johnson wrote:

> Doug responded:
>
> > CJohnson Wrote
> >> !!! The WG standard for making a request for free-busy time is with
> >> the VFREEBUSY object. !!! RFC 2445, p. 58:
> >
> >It does and in -exactlyt- the same way - by the CUA and we added by 
> the CS.
> I wish Doug were correct. But CAP-12e has no provision that permits
> the CUA to make a free-busy request using the VFREEBUSY component
> and get a direct response.

Nor does iTIP - it has to be processed by the CUA - correct?
Currently the only way to send a message is iMIP, that does not
generate an auto reply unless your MTA has a CUA built into it.

> — It's not in Section 10.12.1. That section attempts to define how to get
> VFREEBUSY components using a VQUERY.
> — It's not done using iTIP (CMD:CREATE, METHOD:REQUEST). All [iTIP]
> messages are deposited in the CS in the UNPROCESSED state. The CUA
> simply gets a "success" response. (Section 10.4).

Which is exactly how iMIP does it to your mailbox to later be
processed by your CUA - correct?

--

Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
-------------------------------|-----------------------------
Doug@xxxxxxxxx                 | Office: (208)520-4044
http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                              |   Cell: (208)520-4044

              We Do Standards - You Need Standards

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature