Re: Status of the CALSCH working group

[Doug Royer <Doug@xxxxxxxxx>]

John Stracke wrote:

> It basically democratizes the process of developing noninteroperable 
> extensions: if your CS has these unspecified tools, then any admin can 
> add new verbs to the protocol, and a CUA has to hope that the user 
> knows what the stored query's name means. 

By admin I did not mean that the user is not the admin of their own 
calendar. I just
meant non-cap unspecified tool, much like we allow for a non-cap unspecified
tool to create immutable vcars.

And by your same logic a non-owner admin could change all of the VEVENT 
UID's
in your calendar breaking you -- and just as unlikely.

--

Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
-------------------------------|-----------------------------
Doug@xxxxxxxxx                 | Office: (208)520-4044
http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                              |   Cell: (208)520-4044

              We Do Standards - You Need Standards

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature