RE: Status of the CALSCH working group (Alarms/SEQUENCE)

[Satya Vempati <satyanarayana.vempati@xxxxxxx>]

I would like to suggest that everyone should make a conscious effort to
keep the discussion productive and not give way to acrimony. We need to
keep in mind that these archives have to be of some use to people who,
in future, browse them for information and answers.

Most of the recent posts are nothing but invective and as such should
not posted to a technical public forum such as this one.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-calendar@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-ietf-calendar@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Smith
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 12:10 PM
To: ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Status of the CALSCH working group (Alarms/SEQUENCE)


Bruce_Kahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> Doug wrote on 11/07/2003 04:14:11 PM:
> > > Alarms/SEQUENCE -- I remain confused: Can there be two identical
> > > objects in the same calendar? If not, we should clearly say so.
> >
> > You can and iCAL has no such restriction on any component including
> VALARMs.
> 
> Sorry, iCalendar does state that multiple repeat instances at the same
> date/time are to be considered one:
>

What does that have to do with the topic or the email asked or answered?
Nothing at all.

Do you even follow the topics before posting?