Re: Thick skinned chairs (Was Re: different calendar scales)

[pregen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Thanks.

Bruce_Kahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent by: owner-ietf-calendar@xxxxxxxxxxxx

11/10/2003 17:00

To	Mark Smith <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc	ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx, Ned Freed <ned.freed@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ted Hardie <hardie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject	Thick skinned chairs (Was Re: different calendar scales)

Mark said on 11/04/2003 07:45:19
PM MST: 
> > Or, better yet, get another, tougher skinned, working group
> > chair.
> 
> I would vote for that, I can not find ONE constructive comment
> or item you have posted in the last year. I can not find that
> you called conciseness on anything in the last year even when
> no one objected to a proposal.

I for one do not belive that being think skinned is a requirement of any
IETF WG chair.  While WG discussions can sometimes become heated there
should never be a need for barbs to be constantly shot at chairs.  Just
as referees in boxing are not big muscle bound people in order to survive
being in the ring and calling the match, chairs should not be expected
to take any abuse just because their actions or opinions are not popuplar
with one side or another.   

Im sure the ADs would agree with this assessment too.  While its helpful
for chairs to be more engaged at times, there should never be a need for
them to be thick skinned to in order to handle abuse from unruly or quarrelsome
WG participants. 

Bruce 
===========================================================================
Bruce Kahn                  
             INet: Bruce_Kahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messaging & Collaboration            
    Phone: 978.399.6496
IBM Software Group                
        FAX: and nothing but the FAX...
Standard disclaimers apply, even where prohibited by law...