Re: Status of the CALSCH working group (Alarms/SEQUENCE)

[Bruce_Kahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Mark blasted away on 11/10/2003 03:09:48 PM:
> What does that have to do with the topic or the email asked or answered?
> Nothing at all.
> 
> Do you even follow the topics before posting?

Normally I would not respond to this
kind of trolling but Ill give you the benefit of the doubt and chalk this
up to ignorance rather than malice.  Nathaniel wrote:

Alarms/SEQUENCE -- I remain confused: Can there be
two identical 
objects in the same calendar? If not, we should clearly say so.

to which Doug replied:

You can and iCAL has no such restriction on any component
including VALARMs.

to which I pointed out that he was incorrect.
 iCalendar has at least 5 places where it says duplicates are to be
treated as a single instance.  I then pointed out that CAP also has
text to this effect.  So my reply was on topic just like the last
time you said it wasnt.

Bruce
===========================================================================
Bruce Kahn                  
             INet: Bruce_Kahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messaging & Collaboration            
    Phone: 978.399.6496
IBM Software Group                
        FAX: and nothing but the FAX...
Standard disclaimers apply, even where prohibited by law...