Mark said on 11/04/2003 07:45:19 PM MST: > > Or, better yet, get another, tougher skinned, working group > > chair. > > I would vote for that, I can not find ONE constructive comment > or item you have posted in the last year. I can not find that > you called conciseness on anything in the last year even when > no one objected to a proposal.
I for one do not belive that being think skinned is a requirement of any IETF WG chair. While WG discussions can sometimes become heated there should never be a need for barbs to be constantly shot at chairs. Just as referees in boxing are not big muscle bound people in order to survive being in the ring and calling the match, chairs should not be expected to take any abuse just because their actions or opinions are not popuplar with one side or another.
Im sure the ADs would agree with this assessment too. While its helpful for chairs to be more engaged at times, there should never be a need for them to be thick skinned to in order to handle abuse from unruly or quarrelsome WG participants.
Although I do not like the way Mark formulates his comments, they tend to be accurate. You do tend to post about already fixed items or change the contents to make your post true AND unrelated to the topic.
Doug Royer | http://INET-Consulting.com
-------------------------------|-----------------------------
Doug@xxxxxxxxx | Office: (208)520-4044
http://Royer.com/People/Doug | Fax: (866)594-8574
| Cell: (208)520-4044Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature