Re: Thick skinned chairs (Was Re: different calendar scales)

[Mark Smith <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bruce_Kahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> Doug replied on 11/10/2003 06:43:35 PM:
> > > Im sure the ADs would agree with this assessment too.  While its
> > > helpful for chairs to be more engaged at times, there should never
> be
> > > a need for them to be thick skinned to in order to handle abuse
> from
> > > unruly or quarrelsome WG participants.
> >
> > I feel you also fall into that category.
> 
> Thats your perogative.  However, dont confuse persistance on issues
> with abuse of chairs when they disagree with you.  I have NOT verbally
> abused or acosted the chairs like others here.

You post misleading posts about them, the history
of the topic, or conveniently neglect to post that there were
are majority that disagreed with you, how is that different
and not abuse?

Your posts continue to fail to be realistic with respect
with what was posted.