Re: The w3c test objects.

[Doug Royer <Doug@xxxxxxxxx>]

Libby Miller wrote:

> You can find our sample iCalendar files and the derived RDF files here:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/test/
> http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/
>  
(A) I have seen these before. Some minor nits:

Many of the VALARMs have an ATTACH property that is not valid:

       ATTACH;VALUE=URI:Ping

Extra CR LF's in them between components.

Some have no METHOD property - does that mean they are booked
like in CAP?

Some VEVENTs have no SUBJECT or DESCRIPTION.

(B) RDF issues I have noticed in the examples:

 I noticed that the RDF format drops the 'VALUE' parameter completely.

 The RDF-cal has a 'class' tag, that is not the same as the iCAL 
'class' tag.

 The examples drop the CLASS property nd its PUBLIC, PRIVATE,
 and CONFIDENTIAL values completely.

 The RDF-cal does not distinguish between property values and parameters.

 I have yet to see an example of how multivalued values are treated.
 Is the XML tag replicated or is the value just put in 'as is'?

(C) And there is an xCAL mailing list with low volume. It has not been used
     in a while but the archives are online.

   To subscribe send email to 'majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' with
   a subject of 'subscribe xcal-dev'.

   Archives at:            http://inet-consulting.com/xcal-dev






--

Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
-------------------------------|-----------------------------
Doug@xxxxxxxxx                 | Office: (208)520-4044
http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                              |   Cell: (208)520-4044

              We Do Standards - You Need Standards

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature