[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (RECUR-LIMIT) The intent/meaning of EXPAND and its usefullness



There is a little confusion in the text then.
It would be helpful if it explicitly states that if STORES-EXPANDED is
true,
RECUR-EXPAND, RECUR-LIMIT, EXPAND are ignored.
At least is that what you said above?

I have made a note. Suggested text changes?

You might want to use the new bugzilla recently posted and add it as an issue.

We can't support METHOD:ADD.
They have to create a new recurrence set or delete the old set and
create a new one.


Okay, then that is an iTIP issues, not a CAP issue. The iTIP objects would react
the same as in iMIP and thus no such additional instances could be added at
the iTIP level.

--

Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
-------------------------------|-----------------------------
Doug@xxxxxxxxx                 | Office: (208)520-4044
http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                              |   Cell: (208)520-4044

We Do Standards - You Need Standards


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature