I would suggest that you increment the SEQUENCE and send out a new object. This is the most portable way. The new object should use RDATEs when ever possible and not RRULE or EXRULE for maximum portability.
If you can not describe them in one VEVENT, use two (or more) VEVENTs, the 2nd and up set METHOD:ADD
The real problem is that ALL are valid iCal/iTIP, and most vendors only did one of them. Many can display many of the variations, but can not edit or reply to ones that they can not generate.
Carsten Guenther wrote:
Good day!
I have a question about the use of EXDATE: should this property be generated for ALL exceptions (deleted and changed) or only for deleted occurrences? So in an example with one deleted occurrence and one changed occurrence (resulting in a second VEVENT) should there be one or two EXDATEs in the base VEVENT?
Thanks, Carsten