So your first request was to have NO access defined? Not HTTP or FTP? Clearly not useful.
It still sounds like I need to remove any reference to HTTP so that people do not expect a formatted view.
Doug Royer wrote:
Simon Vaillancourt wrote:
... I don't believe that specifying the protocol to transfer the timezones should be included in a registry draft.
So your reversing your request that it be HTTP?
That's not the point, the first "request" was if it was specified in the draft it'd rather be http, but clearly separating both the concept of registry and service is the best option IMO and the current draft is mixing both.
--Simon
_______________________________________________ Ietf-calsify mailing list Ietf-calsify@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-calsify
Doug Royer | http://INET-Consulting.com -------------------------------|-----------------------------
begin:vcard fn:Doug Royer n:Royer;Doug org:INET-Consulting.com adr:;;1795 W. Broadway St #266;Idaho Falls;ID;83402;U.S.A email;internet:Doug@xxxxxxxxx title:CEO tel;work:208-881-0380 tel;fax:866-494-8574 note;quoted-printable:AOL: SupportUnix=0D=0A= MSN: Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=0D=0A= Yahoo: Help4Unix x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://Royer.com version:2.1 end:vcard
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature