Re: [Ietf-calsify] TZ: polygon

[Simon Vaillancourt <simon.vaillancourt@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm saying it breaks RFC2445 because the formal definition of a 
VTIMEZONE component does not include anything allowing the addition of 
such property, if the formal definition had a iana-token, then it could 
be added.

--Simon

Doug Royer wrote:

> So in other words, you do not know if breaks anything?
> You just think they would break?
>
> Simon Vaillancourt wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Doug Royer wrote:
> >
> > > Any parser that it breaks is not 2445 compliant (unless you
> > > have some specific reason or bug in the draft
> > > you have not yet stated)..
> >
> > Maybe I missed something in 2445 but, in section 4.6.5, the formal 
> > definition of a VTIMEZONE object does not seem to contain anything 
> > allowing the addition of new non-"x-prop" parameters in a VTIMEZONE 
> > component(i.e.: iana-token). So if you do a parser and it validates 
> > the data using the formal definitions i will break (But yes most 
> > parsers are more forgiving than that).