Re: [Ietf-caldav] xCal - resubmitted.

[Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx>]

Doug Royer wrote:
> The xCal draft has been rewritten and submitted to the IETF.
>
> I have an XSLT translation file that I will be releasing
> soon on SourceForge that can translate an xCal object
> back to an iCal object. I am waiting for SourceForge
> to approve the project name.
>
> Discussion takes place on xCal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Copies of the draft at:
>
>     http://INET-Consulting.com/draft-royer-calsch-xcal-01.txt
>     http://INET-Consulting.com/draft-royer-calsch-xcal-01.html
>     http://INET-Consulting.com/draft-royer-calsch-xcal-01.xml
>
>
> JOIN the xCal mailing list at:
>
>     http://inet-consulting.com/mailman/listinfo/xcal

Just two quick formal comments...:

1) Is it intentional that in the examples, the iCalendar container 
element is in no namespace?

2) I don't think the IETF will let you use something like 
"http://ietf.org/rfc/rfcXXXX.txt"; as namespace name; but if they do, you 
probably should use "http://ietf.org/rfc/rfcXXXX"; (no extension) instead.

Best regards, Julian