Re: [Ietf-caldav] xCal - resubmitted.

[Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx>]

Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 11:08 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > Copies of the draft at:
> > >
> > >    http://INET-Consulting.com/draft-royer-calsch-xcal-01.txt
> > >    http://INET-Consulting.com/draft-royer-calsch-xcal-01.html
> > >    http://INET-Consulting.com/draft-royer-calsch-xcal-01.xml
> >
> > Just two quick formal comments...:
> >
> > 1) Is it intentional that in the examples, the iCalendar container 
> > element is in no namespace?
> >
> > 2) I don't think the IETF will let you use something like 
> > "http://ietf.org/rfc/rfcXXXX.txt"; as namespace name;
>
>
> Right; I gather Best Current Practice is...
>
> [[[
> If the registrant wishes to
>    have a URI assigned, then a URN of the form
>
>       urn:ietf:params:xml:<class>:<id>
>
>    will be assigned where <class> is the type of the document being
>    registered (see below).
> ]]]
>  -- http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3688.html

One could probably also use: <urn:ietf:rfc:NNNN> (see 
<http://ietf.org/rfc/rfc2648>).

> ...

Best regards, Julian