Archive of ietf-calendar, by thread
Go to date index
Go to main page for ietf-calendar
Page 3 of 14
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
- Re: Uniquness of 4.4.2 Modify A Recurring Instance, (continued)
- Re: Uniquness of 4.4.2 Modify A Recurring Instance,
Doug Royer
- Re: Uniquness of 4.4.2 Modify A Recurring Instance,
Michael Fair
- Re: Uniquness of 4.4.2 Modify A Recurring Instance,
Doug Royer
- Re: Uniquness of 4.4.2 Modify A Recurring Instance,
Tim Hare
- Re: Uniquness of 4.4.2 Modify A Recurring Instance,
Michael Fair
- Re: Uniquness of 4.4.2 Modify A Recurring Instance,
Doug Royer
- Re: Uniquness of 4.4.2 Modify A Recurring Instance,
Michael Fair
- Re: Uniquness of 4.4.2 Modify A Recurring Instance,
Doug Royer
- Re: Uniquness of 4.4.2 Modify A Recurring Instance,
Michael Fair
- Re: Uniquness of 4.4.2 Modify A Recurring Instance,
Doug Royer
- Re: Uniquness of 4.4.2 Modify A Recurring Instance,
Michael Fair
- RE: Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's model?,
Satya Vempati
- New question in regards to the fixed-id model,
Michael Fair
- Re: New question in regards to the fixed-id model,
Doug Royer
How many people are there using the fixed-id model?,
Michael Fair
Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's skewed model of iCalendar besides Doug,
Robert_Ransdell
- RE: Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's skewed model of iCalendar besides Doug,
Anil SRIVASTAVA
- RE: Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's model?,
Chris Olds
- Re: Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's model?,
Michael Fair
- Re: Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's model?,
Chris Olds
- RE: Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's model?,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's model?,
Doug Royer
- Re: Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's model?,
Robert_Ransdell
- Re: Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's model?,
Doug Royer
- Re: Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's model?,
Dan Winship
- Re: Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's model?,
Doug Royer
- Re: Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's model?,
Robert_Ransdell
- Re: Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's model?,
Doug Royer
- Re: Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's model?,
Robert_Ransdell
- Re: Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's model?,
Doug Royer
- Re: Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's model?,
Robert_Ransdell
- Re: Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's model?,
Doug Royer
- Re: Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's skewed model of iCalendar besides Doug,
Michael Fair
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Is there anybody out there supporting Doug's skewed model of iCalendar besides Doug,
Ki Wong
CAP -12 and LAST CALL (hopefully),
Doug Royer
cap-11 questions,
Kees Cook
No active 2445 author is a big problem,
Mark Swanson
Bug/issue tracking,
Doug Royer
Guardian discussion of Multiple time systems,
Shannon J. Clark
Hello, from a new member of the list,
Tim Hare
RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Satya Vempati
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Tim Hare
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Robert_Ransdell
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Robert_Ransdell
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Robert_Ransdell
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Tim Hare
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Satya Vempati
- RE: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
pregen
- RE: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Satya Vempati
- RE: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Satya Vempati
- RE: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Satya Vempati
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Chris Olds
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Chris Olds
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Bruce_Kahn
- RE: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Satya Vempati
- RE: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Satya Vempati
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Michael Fair
- Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Doug Royer
- RE: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Satya Vempati
- RE: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Satya Vempati
- RE: RECURRENCE-ID discussion,
Satya Vempati
Free Busy topic,
pregen
CAP-11 is out,
Doug Royer
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-cap-11.txt,
Internet-Drafts
Re: free-busy QUERY - summary (I think),
Doug Royer
Clarification on SEARCH command,
Preston Stephenson
free-busy QUERY,
Craig Johnson
Re: Cap Free-Busy Request;,
Craig Johnson
Cap Free-Busy Request; some compelling thoughts,
Craig Johnson
CAP -11,
Doug Royer
Re: Cap Free-Busy Request - UPN vs CALID?,
Craig Johnson
Re: Cap Free-Busy Request - vs QUERY?,
Doug Royer
Cap Free-Busy Request,
Craig Johnson
IPv6 transition and calsch RFCs,
Bob Mahoney
BYDAY and YEARLY,
Dan Hickman
CAP draft - last call, etc.,
pregen
- Re: CAP draft - last call, etc.,
Doug Royer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: CAP draft - last call, etc.,
Satya Vempati
- Re: CAP draft - last call, etc.,
pregen
- RE: CAP draft - last call, etc.,
Satya Vempati
- RE: CAP draft - last call, etc.,
Satya Vempati
- Re: CAP draft - last call, etc.,
pregen
- Re: CAP draft - last call, etc.,
pregen
- RE: CAP draft - last call, etc.,
Arnaud Quillaud
- RE: CAP draft - last call, etc.,
pregen
- Re: CAP draft - last call, etc. (scoping),
Doug Royer
- Re: CAP draft - last call, etc. (BEEP profile),
Doug Royer
- CAP - BEEP Profile,
Doug Royer
- Re: CAP - BEEP Profile,
Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: CAP - BEEP Profile,
Doug Royer
- Re: CAP - BEEP Profile,
Marshall Rose
- Re: CAP - BEEP Profile,
Doug Royer
- Re: CAP - BEEP Profile,
Marshall Rose
- Re: CAP - BEEP Profile,
Doug Royer
- Re: CAP - BEEP Profile,
Marshall Rose
- Re: CAP - BEEP Profile,
Doug Royer
- Re: CAP - BEEP Profile,
John Berthels
- Re: CAP - BEEP Profile,
Doug Royer
- Re: CAP - BEEP Profile,
John Berthels
- Re: CAP - BEEP Profile,
Marshall Rose
- Re: CAP - BEEP Profile,
Doug Royer
Next Meeting?,
Bob Mahoney
draft-royer-cap-sort-00,
Harrie Hazewinkel
I-D ACTION:draft-royer-cap-notify-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
I-D ACTION:draft-royer-cap-sort-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
CAP ABNF,
Doug Royer
ADMINISTRIVIA: testing the mailing list,
Paul Hoffman / IMC
Default TARGET,
Craig Johnson
CAP ABNF: queryc is only used in 1 command?,
Bruce_Kahn
CAP-QUERY ABNF disagrees with examples,
Andrea Campi
New threaded list archive of our mailing list,
pregen
Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
V. Oliver
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
John Stracke
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
gustav . mango
- RE: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
kiwong
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Robert_Ransdell
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Robert_Ransdell
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
sv134512
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Chris Olds
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
George Babics
- Re: Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
gustav . mango
- RE: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
kiwong
- Re: Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
gustav . mango
- RE: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
kiwong
- Re: Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
gustav . mango
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id (master object),
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id (master object),
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id (master object),
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id (master object),
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
Doug Royer
- Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id,
kiwong
Page 3 of 14
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail
Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections
to this Web page, please send them to
phoffman@imc.org.