Archive of ietf-calendar, by thread

Go to date index
Go to main page for ietf-calendar

Page 4 of 14
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, (continued)
- Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Robert_Ransdell
  - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Robert_Ransdell
    - Re: CANCEL and SEQUENCE usage, Doug Royer
    - Re: CANCEL and SEQUENCE usage, Robert_Ransdell
    - Re: CANCEL and SEQUENCE usage, Doug Royer
    - Re: CANCEL and SEQUENCE usage, Robert_Ransdell
    - Re: CANCEL and SEQUENCE usage, Doug Royer
    - Re: CANCEL and SEQUENCE usage, Robert_Ransdell
    - Re: CANCEL and SEQUENCE usage, Doug Royer
    - Re: CANCEL and SEQUENCE usage, Robert_Ransdell
    - Re: CANCEL and SEQUENCE usage, Doug Royer
    - Re: CANCEL and SEQUENCE usage, Robert_Ransdell
    - Re: CANCEL and SEQUENCE usage, Doug Royer
    - Re: CANCEL and SEQUENCE usage, Robert_Ransdell
    - Re: CANCEL and SEQUENCE usage, Doug Royer
    - Re: CANCEL and SEQUENCE usage, Doug Royer
    - Re: CANCEL and SEQUENCE usage, Robert_Ransdell
    - Re: CANCEL and SEQUENCE usage, Doug Royer
    - Re: CANCEL and SEQUENCE usage, Robert_Ransdell
    - Re: CANCEL and SEQUENCE usage, Doug Royer
    - Re: CANCEL and SEQUENCE usage, Robert_Ransdell
- RE: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Arnaud Quillaud
  - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Arnaud Quillaud
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
  - RE: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Chris Olds
    - RE: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
- Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Arnaud Quillaud
  - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
  - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Robert_Ransdell
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Robert_Ransdell
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Robert_Ransdell
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Arnaud Quillaud
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Robert_Ransdell
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Chris Olds
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Arnaud Quillaud
    - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
- RE: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Satya Vempati
- Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Robert_Ransdell
  - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
  - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
- RE: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Satya Vempati
- Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Jay Parker
  - Re: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Doug Royer
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Bruce_Kahn
- RE: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Arnaud Quillaud
- Re: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, pregen
- RE: Fw: Correct handling of Recurrence-id, Bruce_Kahn
Follow up to BEEP and CAP - one-to-many, Preston Stephenson
- Re: Follow up to BEEP and CAP - one-to-many, Doug Royer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Follow up to BEEP and CAP - one-to-many, Preston Stephenson
  - Re: Follow up to BEEP and CAP - one-to-many, Doug Royer
- Re: Re: Follow up to BEEP and CAP - one-to-many, gustav . mango
iTIP REPLY question, Preston Stephenson
- Re: iTIP REPLY question, John Stracke
  - Re: iTIP REPLY question, Doug Royer
    - Re: iTIP REPLY question, John Stracke
    - Re: iTIP REPLY question, John Stracke
    - Re: iTIP REPLY question (realtime), Doug Royer
    - Re: iTIP REPLY question, Doug Royer
    - Re: iTIP REPLY question (realtime), Doug Royer
- Re: iTIP REPLY question, Doug Royer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Re: iTIP REPLY question, gustav . mango
  - Re: iTIP REPLY question, John Stracke
- Re: iTIP REPLY question, Preston Stephenson
- Re: Re: iTIP REPLY question, gustav . mango
- Re: iTIP REPLY question, Jay Parker
  - Re: iTIP REPLY question, Doug Royer
- Re: Re: iTIP REPLY question, gustav . mango
- Re: iTIP REPLY question, Jay Parker
  - Re: iTIP REPLY question, Doug Royer
- Re: iTIP REPLY question, Bruce_Kahn
  - Re: iTIP REPLY question, Doug Royer
    - Re: iTIP REPLY question, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: iTIP REPLY question, John Stracke
    - Re: iTIP REPLY question, Doug Royer
    - Re: iTIP REPLY question, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: iTIP REPLY question, Doug Royer
    - Re: iTIP REPLY question, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: iTIP REPLY question, Doug Royer
    - Re: iTIP REPLY question, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: iTIP REPLY question, Doug Royer
    - Re: iTIP REPLY question, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: iTIP REPLY question, Doug Royer
    - Re: iTIP REPLY question, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: iTIP REPLY question, Doug Royer
- Re: iTIP REPLY question, Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Re: iTIP REPLY question, gustav . mango
- Re: Re: iTIP REPLY question, gustav . mango
- Re: iTIP REPLY question, Jay Parker
  - Re: iTIP REPLY question, Doug Royer
- Re: iTIP REPLY question, Jay Parker
  - Re: iTIP REPLY question, Doug Royer
- Re: Re: iTIP REPLY question, gustav . mango
- Re: Re: iTIP REPLY question, gustav . mango
iSIP applicability note, Pekka Pessi
- RE: iSIP applicability note, Seamus Garvey
- Re: iSIP applicability note, John Stracke
note to test list, pregen
cap-10 section 9. comments, slh
CAP / Busytime Restart, Bruce_Kahn
- Re: CAP / Busytime Restart, John Stracke
  - Re: CAP / Busytime Restart, Bruce_Kahn
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CAP / Busytime Restart, pregen
- Re: CAP / Busytime Restart, pregen
  - Re: CAP / Busytime Restart, John Stracke
    - Re: CAP / Busytime Restart, Doug Royer
- Re: CAP / Busytime Restart, pregen
- Re: CAP / Busytime Restart, pregen
How do you get the METHOD property on a SEARCH, Preston Stephenson
- Re: How do you get the METHOD property on a SEARCH, Dan Winship
- Re: How do you get the METHOD property on a SEARCH, Bruce_Kahn
  - Re: How do you get the METHOD property on a SEARCH, John Stracke
- Re: How do you get the METHOD property on a SEARCH, Andrea Campi
  - Re: How do you get the METHOD property on a SEARCH, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: How do you get the METHOD property on a SEARCH, Doug Royer
    - Re: How do you get the METHOD property on a SEARCH, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: How do you get the METHOD property on a SEARCH, Doug Royer
    - Re: How do you get the METHOD property on a SEARCH, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: How do you get the METHOD property on a SEARCH, Andrea Campi
    - Re: How do you get the METHOD property on a SEARCH, Bruce_Kahn
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: How do you get the METHOD property on a SEARCH, Preston Stephenson
  - Re: How do you get the METHOD property on a SEARCH, Doug Royer
- Re: How do you get the METHOD property on a SEARCH, Preston Stephenson
  - Re: How do you get the METHOD property on a SEARCH, Doug Royer
- Fwd: How do you get the METHOD property on a SEARCH, Andrea Campi
cap-10 section 8. comments, slh
do the sample queries actually work?, Dan Winship
cap-10 section 6.1.1 CAL-QUERY Value Type, Dan Winship
CAP plumbing, Preston Stephenson
TARGET clarification, Preston Stephenson
DURATION vs DTEND, Dan Winship
- Re: DURATION vs DTEND, John Stracke
  - Re: DURATION vs DTEND, Dan Winship
- Re: DURATION vs DTEND, Doug Royer
  - Re: DURATION vs DTEND, John Stracke
    - Re: DURATION vs DTEND, Doug Royer
    - Re: DURATION vs DTEND, John Stracke
    - Re: DURATION vs DTEND, Doug Royer
    - Re: DURATION vs DTEND, John Stracke
    - Re: DURATION vs DTEND, Doug Royer
    - Re: DURATION vs DTEND, Jonathan Lennox
    - Re: DURATION vs DTEND, Lawrence Greenfield
    - Re: DURATION vs DTEND, Doug Royer
    - Re: DURATION vs DTEND, Alan Davies
  - Re: DURATION vs DTEND, Lawrence Greenfield
    - Re: DURATION vs DTEND, Doug Royer
    - Re: DURATION vs DTEND, John Stracke
    - Re: DURATION vs DTEND, Lawrence Greenfield
    - Re: DURATION vs DTEND, Doug Royer
    - Re: DURATION vs DTEND, John Stracke
    - Re: DURATION vs DTEND, Dan Winship
    - Re: DURATION vs DTEND, Doug Royer
CAP Editoral: Acronyms in Section 1, Bruce_Kahn
- Re: CAP Editoral: Acronyms in Section 1, John Stracke
  - Re: CAP Editoral: Acronyms in Section 1, Bruce_Kahn
iTIP Bug: VFREEBUSY REPLYs, Bruce_Kahn
- Re: iTIP Bug: VFREEBUSY REPLYs, John Stracke
  - Re: iTIP Bug: VFREEBUSY REPLYs, Bruce_Kahn
cap-10 sections 1-5 comments/questions (mostly boring), Dan Winship
RE: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT, Preston Stephenson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fw: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT, Robert_Ransdell
  - Re: Fw: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT, Martin Jackson
- Re: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT, Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Fw: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT, pregen
cap-10 section 7. comments, slh
Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, Preston Stephenson
- Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, John Stracke
- Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, Doug Royer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, Preston Stephenson
  - Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, Doug Royer
- Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, Preston Stephenson
  - Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, Bruce_Kahn
- Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, Preston Stephenson
CAP & busytime?, Bruce_Kahn
- <Possible follow-ups>
- CAP & busytime?, Bruce_Kahn
  - Re: CAP & busytime?, John Stracke
    - Re: CAP & busytime?, Bruce_Kahn
  - Re: CAP & busytime?, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP & busytime?, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: CAP & busytime?, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP & busytime?, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT, Dan Winship
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT, John Stracke
    - RE: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT, Paul B. Hill
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT, Lawrence Greenfield
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT, John Stracke
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT, John Stracke
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP & busytime?, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: CAP & busytime?, John Stracke
    - Re: CAP & busytime?, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: CAP & busytime?, John Stracke
    - Re: CAP & busytime?, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP & busytime? - CUA-BOT, Bruce_Kahn
Re: mailing list size, pregen
Updated calsch.org web site., Doug Royer
- Re: (OOPS) Updated calsch.org web site., Doug Royer
Re: ietf-calendar Non-sub: xCal attach property, Yael Shaham-Gafni
- Re: ietf-calendar Non-sub: xCal attach property, Doug Royer
Getting close to final draft, Doug Royer
Jabber log for calsch meeting, pregen
jabber at IETF, pregen
- RE: jabber at IETF, Shannon J. Clark
  - Re: jabber at IETF, John Stracke
    - RE: jabber at IETF, Seamus Garvey
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: jabber at IETF, pregen
- RE: jabber at IETF, pregen
  - RE: jabber at IETF, Mark Tearle
do timezone descriptions have to be in the same document?, Libby Miller
- Re: do timezone descriptions have to be in the same document?, Olivier Gutknecht
  - Re: do timezone descriptions have to be in the same document?, Libby Miller
- Re: do timezone descriptions have to be in the same document?, John Stracke
  - Re: do timezone descriptions have to be in the same document?, Libby Miller
Events spanning a day boundary, Paul Sharpe
- Re: Events spanning a day boundary, Doug Royer
- Re: Events spanning a day boundary, Bruce_Kahn
  - Re: Events spanning a day boundary, Paul Sharpe
iSIP clarification, pregen
IETF dinner - Monday night, pregen
cap-10 sections 3.-6. comments, slh
iSIP draft - ??, pregen
- Re: iSIP draft - ??, John Stracke
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: iSIP draft - ??, pregen
CAP Last call???, pregen
- Re: CAP Last call???, John Stracke
- Re: CAP Last call???, Bruce_Kahn
  - Re: CAP Last call??? - beep, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP Last call??? - beep, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: CAP Last call??? - beep, Bruce_Kahn
  - Re: CAP Last call??? - delete / marked for delete, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP Last call??? - delete / marked for delete, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: CAP Last call??? - delete / marked for delete, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP Last call??? - delete / marked for delete, Bruce_Kahn
  - Re: CAP Last call??? - multipart., Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP Last call??? - multipart., Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: CAP Last call??? - multipart., Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP Last call??? - multipart., Bruce_Kahn
  - Re: CAP Last call???, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP Last call???, John Stracke
    - Re: CAP Last call???, John Stracke
    - Re: CAP Last call???, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: CAP Last call???, John Stracke
- Re: CAP Last call???, Bruce_Kahn
  - Re: CAP Last call???, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP Last call???, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: CAP Last call???, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP Last call???, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: CAP Last call???, Doug Royer
    - Re: CAP Last call???, Bruce_Kahn
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CAP Last call???, pregen
  - Re: CAP Last call???, Doug Royer
cap-10 section 2. comments, slh
[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-pessi-ical-isip-01.txt], Doug Royer
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-pessi-ical-isip-01.txt], Pekka Pessi
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-pessi-ical-isip-01.txt], pregen
  - Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-pessi-ical-isip-01.txt], Pekka Pessi
cap-10 section 1. comments, slh
java beep packages, slh
Partial equality match and sort order, Doug Royer
- Re: Partial equality match and sort order, John Stracke
  - Re: Partial equality match and sort order, Doug Royer
  - Re: Partial equality match and sort order, Doug Royer
    - Re: Partial equality match and sort order, John Stracke
- Re: Partial equality match and sort order, Bruce_Kahn
  - Re: Partial equality match and sort order, John Stracke
  - Re: Partial equality match and sort order, Doug Royer
  - Re: Partial equality match and sort order, Andrea Campi
    - Re: Partial equality match and sort order, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: Partial equality match and sort order, slh
    - Re: Partial equality match and sort order, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: Partial equality match and sort order, Doug Royer
    - Re: Partial equality match and sort order, Bruce_Kahn
    - Re: Partial equality match and sort order, Doug Royer
    - Re: Partial equality match and sort order, Patrice Lapierre
    - Re: Partial equality match and sort order, sfg
    - Re: Partial equality match and sort order, Doug Royer
    - Re: Partial equality match and sort order, Dan Winship
    - Re: Partial equality match and sort order, Doug Royer
    - Re: Partial equality match and sort order, John Stracke
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Partial equality match and sort order, pregen
- Re: Partial equality match and sort order, pregen
- Re: Partial equality match and sort order, Bruce_Kahn
  - Re: Partial equality match and sort order, John Stracke
- Re: Partial equality match and sort order, Bruce_Kahn
cc: Re: Charset, Ralph . Patterson
- Re: cc: Re: Charset, Doug Royer
2445 test files?, Chris Olds
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-cap-10.txt, Internet-Drafts
simple question about parsing, Lawrence Greenfield
- Re: simple question about parsing, Chris Olds
  - Re: simple question about parsing, Lawrence Greenfield
- Re: simple question about parsing, Doug Royer
  - Re: simple question about parsing, Lawrence Greenfield
re: Charset, Robert_Ransdell
- Re: Charset, Doug Royer
  - Re: Charset, Robert_Ransdell
    - Re: Charset, Doug Royer
    - Re: Charset, Robert_Ransdell
    - Re: Charset, Doug Royer
    - Re: Charset, John Stracke
    - Re: Charset, Lawrence Greenfield
    - Re: Charset, Doug Royer
    - Re: Charset, Lawrence Greenfield
    - Re: Charset, Doug Royer
    - Re: Charset, Chris Olds
    - Re: Charset, Doug Royer
    - Re: Charset, Mark Swanson
    - Re: Charset, John Stracke
    - Re: Charset, John Stracke
    - Re: Charset, Mark Swanson
    - Re: Charset, Doug Royer
    - Re: Charset, John Stracke
    - Re: Charset, Doug Royer
    - Re: Charset, John Stracke
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Charset, Ralph . Patterson
  - Re: Charset, John Stracke
IETF San Francisco - who's going?, pregen
draft-ietf-calsch-cap-10, Doug Royer
Push of CAP to ietf, Doug Royer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Push of CAP to ietf, pregen
The charset issue, Doug Royer
- Re: The charset issue, Mark Swanson
  - Re: The charset issue, Mark Swanson
    - Re: The charset issue, Doug Royer
    - Re: The charset issue, Mark Swanson
    - Re: The charset issue, Mark Swanson
    - Re: The charset issue, Chris Olds
    - Re: The charset issue, Chris Olds
    - Re: The charset issue, Doug Royer
  - Re: The charset issue, Doug Royer
  - Re: The charset issue, Andrea Campi
    - Re: The charset issue, Mark Swanson
    - Re: The charset issue, Andrea Campi
    - Re: The charset issue, Mark Swanson
    - Re: The charset issue, Mark Swanson
    - Re: The charset issue, Lawrence Greenfield
    - Re: The charset issue, Mark Swanson
    - Re: The charset issue, Andrea Campi
    - Re: The charset issue, John Stracke
    - Re: The charset issue, Doug Royer
    - Re: The charset issue, John Stracke
    - Re: The charset issue, Doug Royer
    - Re: The charset issue, Andrea Campi
    - Re: The charset issue, Mark Swanson
    - Re: The charset issue, Doug Royer
    - Re: The charset issue, Mark Swanson
    - Re: The charset issue, Andrea Campi
    - Re: The charset issue, Robert_Ransdell
    - Re: The charset issue, Doug Royer
    - Re: The charset issue, John Stracke
    - Re: The charset issue, Doug Royer
    - Message not available
    - Re: The charset issue, Andrea Campi
    - Re: The charset issue, John Stracke
    - Re: The charset issue, Doug Royer
    - Re: The charset issue, John Stracke
    - Re: The charset issue, Andrea Campi
    - Re: The charset issue, ned+ietf-calendar
    - Re: The charset issue, John Stracke
    - Re: The charset issue, Mark Swanson
    - Re: The charset issue, John Stracke
- Re: The charset issue, Mike Higginbottom
Proposed changed GET-CAPABILITY Command, Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Proposed changed GET-CAPABILITY Command, Doug Royer
  - Re: Proposed changed GET-CAPABILITY Command, Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Proposed changed GET-CAPABILITY Command, Andrea Campi
  - Re: Proposed changed GET-CAPABILITY Command, Bruce_Kahn
- Re: Proposed changed GET-CAPABILITY Command, Doug Royer
Q: Outlook conformance (CLASS), Mark Swanson
- Re: Q: Outlook conformance (CLASS), Doug Royer
RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
- Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Doug Royer
  - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Lawrence Greenfield
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Doug Royer
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Chris Olds
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Chris Olds
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Chris Olds
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Doug Royer
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Andrea Campi
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Doug Royer
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Doug Royer
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Doug Royer
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, John Stracke
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, John Stracke
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Doug Royer
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, John Stracke
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Dan Winship
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Doug Royer
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, John Stracke
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Doug Royer
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Robert_Ransdell
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Doug Royer
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, John Stracke
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, John Stracke
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Doug Royer
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Doug Royer
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, John Stracke
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Robert_Ransdell
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Doug Royer
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Chris Olds
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug, Chris Olds
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Chris Olds
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, John Stracke
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, John Stracke
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Doug Royer
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Chris Olds
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
- Re: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mike Higginbottom
  - Re: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
    - Re: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Chris Olds
    - Re: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mike Higginbottom
  - Re: Reading NON UTF-8, Doug Royer
    - Re: Reading NON UTF-8, Mike Higginbottom
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, pregen
  - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Chris Olds
- Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, pregen
  - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Doug Royer
    - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
- Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, pregen
  - Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, Mark Swanson
- Re: RFC: UTF-8 iCalendar bug solution, pregen
CAP REQUEST-STATUS - update and proposals, Doug Royer
REQUEST-STATUS errors and issues for CAP, Doug Royer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: REQUEST-STATUS errors and issues for CAP, Bruce_Kahn
CAP 10-17FEB03: Stored VAGENDAs?, Bruce_Kahn
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CAP 10-17FEB03: Stored VAGENDAs?, pregen
[ERROR - resend Fwd: CAP 17-FEB-2003], Doug Royer
CAP 17-FEB-2003, Doug Royer
- Re: CAP 17-FEB-2003, Bruce_Kahn
Next CAP version soon., Doug Royer
- Re: Next CAP version soon., John Stracke
  - Re: Next CAP version soon., John Stracke
Relative URI in 2445 ?, Olivier Gutknecht

Page 4 of 14
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.