Re: draft-gellens-on-demand-04.txt

[Randall Gellens <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 5:19 PM -0700 6/26/98, Jeff Stephenson wrote:

>I have no problem with the draft noting that port 366 is available for
>use by services that don't integrate ODMR into SMTP, I just don't like
>saying that 366 is _the_ ODMR port.


The current draft says:

>On-Demand Mail Relay is a restricted profile of SMTP which
>runs on port 366

Would you be happier if it said

>On-Demand Mail Relay is a restricted profile of SMTP which
>normally runs on port 366

Or even

>On-Demand Mail Relay is a restricted profile of SMTP.  Port
>number 366 is reserved for On-Demand Mail Relay.

I think the latter form is a bit klunkier; the addition of "normally"
in the former should help your concern with any implication that port
366 must be used.