AS#1-08: Syntax of "Disposition-notification-options" and "*-field"

[tchu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Hu TianCheng)]

Hello Chuck,

During the development of an EDIINT application, we have
enjoyed many favours from AS1. Thank you.
But I came across some problems in the AS#1-08 this time.
Is it my misunderstanding or only a typo?

1) Syntax of "Disposition-notification-options"
The lines preceded with ">" is quoted from original document.

In [draft-ietf-ediint-as1-04]
>5.2 Requesting a signed receipt
>... (21 lines omitted)
>where
> disposition-notification-parameters = parameter *(";" parameter)
>where
> parameter = attribute "=" importance ", " 1#value "
>where
> importance = "required" | "optional "
>
>So the the Disposition-notification-options string could be either
> optional, signed-receipt-protocol, <protocol symbol>;
> optional, signed-receipt-micalg, <micalg1>, <micalg2>,...;

whereas, in [RFC2298]
>2.2 The Disposition-Notification-Options Header
>... (13 lines omitted)
>    parameter = attribute "=" importance "," 1#value

                                                                         ^(a
<"> has been added here by as1)
According to my understanding to RFC2298,
the last 3 lines above quoted from as1 should be:
>So the the Disposition-notification-options string could be either
> signed-receipt-protocol=optional, <protocol symbol>;
> signed-receipt-micalg=optional, <micalg1>, <micalg2>,...;
isn't it?

2) "*-field"s( failure-field, error-field, and warning-field)

In [RFC2298]-Page9
>     disposition-notification-content = [ reporting-ua-field CRLF ]
>          [ mdn-gateway-field CRLF ]
 >          [ original-recipient-field CRLF ]
>          final-recipient-field CRLF
>          [ original-message-id-field CRLF ]
>          disposition-field CRLF
>          *( failure-field CRLF )
>          *( error-field CRLF )
>          *( warning-field CRLF )
>          *( extension-field CRLF )

whereas in [draft-ietf-ediint-as1-04]-5.3.2, three examples of
the "Disposition" header has been listed:
>    Disposition: "disposition-mode"; failed, Failure: unsupported format
>    Disposition: "disposition-mode"; processed/Error: decryption-failed
>    Disposition: "disposition-mode"; processed/Warning:
>                 authentication-failed, processing continued

I think it should be:
>    Disposition: "disposition-mode";failed CRLF
>    Failure: unsupported format CRLF
>    Disposition: "disposition-mode"; processed/error
>    Error: decryption-failed
>    Disposition: "disposition-mode"; processed/warning
>    Warning: authentication-failed, processing continued


Regards,
Timothy