[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: MAPI and EDIINT
Hi,
At this point no signatures have been involved, just plain EDI data, with
the Application/EDIFACT as an attachment within a Multipart/Mixed rather
than as the sole bodypart. Looking forward this would indicate that when
signatures are added, the message would be a Multipart/Mixed with a
Multipart/Signed as one of the bodyparts.
Anyway, the main reason I was asking was to get a clarification of the CNet
pilot and as1 as to whether the EDIINT MIME constructs, Application/EDI???,
Multipart/Signed etc, are allowed to be attachments within a Multipart/Mixed
message or have to be the sole bodypart in the message?
Cheers.
/jh
--
John Hitchins | Harbinger UK,
jhitchins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Quay West. Trafford Wharf Road,
http://www.harbinger.co.uk | Manchester, M17 1HH, England.
| Tel: +44 161 872 2022
| Fax: +44 161 872 2024
The views represented here are mine and not necessarily
those of Harbinger UK.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dale Moberg [SMTP:Dale_Moberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 1998 4:49 PM
> To: 'CNet EDIPilot'; John Hitchins
> Subject: Re: MAPI and EDIINT
>
> Hi John,
>
> If the MIME type is "multipart/mixed", the application does not have any
> clue
> that it should process the message body as a "multipart/signed." So the
> response
> would most likely be to handle the included MIME types in whatever manner
> those types are handled. For example, EDI would possibly go into the
> insecure
> EDI hopper, the signature file would probably just be stored as an
> attachment,
> if I understand what you are saying.
>
> No one during the test, to my recollection anyway,
> has sent that particular MIME format;.
>
> The format does not conform to what the applicability
> statement specifies as the convention for EDI transport. So I guess the
> application
> behavior is undefined in terms of an EDIINT application, and just the
> normal MIME
> handling would come into play.
>
> Others?
>
> Bye
> Dale Moberg
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> John Hitchins <jhitchins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on 11/10/98 12:12:54 PM
> Ext: Unknown
>
> To: "'CNet EDIPilot'" <edipilot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'IETF EDIINT'"
> <ietf-ediint@xxxxxxx>
> cc: (bcc: Dale Moberg/Sterling Commerce)
> Subject: MAPI and EDIINT
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
> Just a small question about the CommerceNet Interoperability tests -
>
> The problem -
> When using Microsoft MAPI to create an Internet mail message containing
> EDI
> data you end up with a Multipart/Mixed message with one of the body parts
> being the rfc1767 application/edi????
> i.e. -
> To: <edi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> From: <edi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary=b1
> --b1
> Content-Type: Application/EDIFACT
> ..
> ..<EDI Data>
> ..
> --b1
>
> Is this format of message, multipart/mixed, allowed by the CommerceNet
> Interoperability tests and do any/all of the Applications being tested
> support it?
> Cheers for your help.
> /jh
> --
> John Hitchins | Harbinger UK,
> jhitchins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Quay West. Trafford Wharf Road,
> http://www.harbinger.co.uk | Manchester, M17 1HH, England.
> | Tel: +44 161 872 2022
> | Fax: +44 161 872 2024
> The views represented here are mine and not necessarily
> those of Harbinger UK.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Message addressed to: edipilot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Archive available at: http://lists.commerce.net/archives/edipilot/
> To (un)subscribe send a message with "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" in the
> body to: edipilot-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Message addressed to: edipilot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Archive available at: http://lists.commerce.net/archives/edipilot/
> To (un)subscribe send a message with "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" in the
> body to: edipilot-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx