RE: EDIINT and HIPAA

[chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Chris Davenport)]

I was afraid you might say that!  Actually I'm not clued up on why it was
considered necessary to introduce these headers.  The answer does not appear
to be in the AS2 revision in internet-drafts.  Perhaps I missed it being
discussed on this list?

How about: "EDI-To" and "EDI-From"

Be happy,

Chris.

---------- Original Message ----------
>From   : "Moberg, Dale" <Dale_Moberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To     : "'chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,ietf-ediint@xxxxxxx
Date   : Thu, 16 Nov 2000 09:27:22 -0500
Subject: RE: EDIINT and HIPAA
>Suggest them now!
>
>Dale Moberg
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 5:33 AM
>> To: ietf-ediint@xxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: EDIINT and HIPAA
>>
>>
>> Could we not come up with some more meaningful names for
>> these new headers?
>> I'm thinking that in 10 years time no-one will remember what
>> "AS2-To" means.
>>
>> Just a thought.
>>
>> Chris.
>>
>> >
>> >I agree, the original AS2 spec was based on AS1, but there
>> were problems
>> >discovered during AS2 interoperability testing (using RFC
>> 822 (email) style
>> >packaging)  related to "To" and "From" headers, which resulted in the
>> >creation
>> >of two new headers specific to AS2, "AS2-To" and "AS2-From".
>>  We (as the
>> >authors
>> >of AS2) will have to provide details of  these new routing
>> headers and
>> >cannot
>> >depend entirely on AS1, as we had originally.
>> >
>> --
>> Chris Davenport              chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Davros Computer Systems
>>
--
Chris Davenport              chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Davros Computer Systems