[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: HL7 Standards Process (was RE: EDIINT and HIPAA)
- To: dick@xxxxxxxx, Kepa Zubeldia <Kepa.Zubeldia@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: HL7 Standards Process (was RE: EDIINT and HIPAA)
- From: Terry Harding <tharding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 16:23:15 -0700
- Cc: "Rishel,Wes" <wes.rishel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Gunther Schadow <gunther@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rik Drummond <rvd2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, CLEM <clem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gary Crough <gcrough@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Beth Morrow <Beth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David@Drummondgroup. Com" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, GISB1@xxxxxxx, ietf-ediint@xxxxxxx
- List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-ediint/mail-archive/>
- List-id: <ietf-ediint.imc.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-ediint-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
- References: <>
- Sender: owner-ietf-ediint@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> That's encouraging because both EDIINT AS2 and GISB EDM are capable of
> signing and encrypting any type of content (a.k.a. payload), as will ebXML
> when we're finished.
AS1 and AS2 can both send any type of payload. It is the individual vendors
implementation which determines if the other payload types are properly
processed.
Terry Harding
Cyclone Commerce Inc.