EDINT WG - five Suggestions

["Rik Drummond" <rvd2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well twenty three products just passed the as2 s/mime profile for ucc.
>From 
this test we found some more clarity problems, but they were minor. Also
in 
the current v12 draft we found a couple of examples that were incorrect.
I 
suggest the following:

	- we submit the v13 draft, with these changes above, with the
name 
	  ietf-ediint-as2-u or ietf-ediint-as2-s
	- we spend march reviewing it to ensure it is clear
	- we see if it is complete and if so send it on for a last call,
a 
	  precedent for rfc status
	- dick brooks please send me a ietf-ediint-as2-g-v13 or
ietf-ediint-as2-p-v13 
	  document so that we can get it on the ietf drafts page for
comment and review

Notice that I have offered two different names for the gisb and ucc
drafts names.

	- the as2-g and as2-u versions indicate industries respectively
gisb and ucc
	- I suggest we name them as2-p and as2-s to indicate
technologies pgp and smime 
	  respectively so that we do not limit either to an industry --
preceptionally


Please give me your feed back.... Best regards, rik