|
Hi,
Following the AS3 certification this year, and
especially our last conference call, I've been in touch with
Terry
Harding to discuss scenarios that were part of the
certification process but that, according to me, were
not
detailed engough in the draft (hosting, not
hosting the FTP server etc...).
I
know that this is not directly linked to AS3 messages format but more to
the binding with FTP, however I think
that
this should be addressed in the standard which must be exhaustive
enough for somebody implementing
AS3 to sucessfully go through the
certification. This is my point and I would be very pleased to discuss
this
with
the group.
I know
that Terry had worked on it but I don't know if he had time to publish a
new draft (I haven't received any new
document through the e-list).
By the way, I agree with Debra, we've
all put a lot of development and testing effort into our product for the
AS3
support and I'd like to see it moved forward in
the standard process.
________________________________
I'd
like to see it moved forward in the standards process.
We've all put a lot of development and testing efforts into our AS3
products
and
it would be nice to see some market acceptance for AS3.
-----Original Message-----
From:
owner-ietf-ediint@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ietf-ediint@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Dale Moberg
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 11:13
AM
To: ietf-ediint@xxxxxxx
Subject: Moving AS3
forward.
Hi
It seems to me that AS3 draft is
pretty stable. Is there anyone on the list that either
1. has concerns about it moving
forward
or
2. would like to see it be moved
forward in the standards process?
If you are an implementer or
just an interested party, please post a message to the list concerning your
position on this. We need to get some indication of the groups’s consensus
on this in the record.
We can then lobby Rik
D.
Thanks
|