Re: Design of X12.58

[Dave Darnell <dave_d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mats,

"to bed"  -- I prefer "to bury" it! (SORRY PETER!)

I think X12.58 will be a non-issue for 99.9%.

I vote to "MOVE ON".

Regards,
dave_d

At 09:19 AM 5/20/96 -0700, Mats Jansson wrote:
>
>>While as one of the developers of X12.58, I am somewhat attached to X12.58,
>>I agree with several of the other correspondents who believe that the vast
>>majority of future "secure" EDI will be done using some form of secure
>>E-mail, not X12.58.
>
>Are we ready to put X12.58 to bed?  Dennis...?
>
>***************************
>Mats Jansson
>LiNK
>415-780-9039
>mjansson@agathon.com
>
>
>
======================================
|   David Darnell              
|   SysTrends, Inc.             
|   Arizona EC/EDI Roundtable   
|   1850 East Carver Road       
|   Tempe, AZ 85284             
|   Tel (602)838-5316           
|   Fax (602)897-8032           
|   mailto://dave_d@systrends.com        
======================================