[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Message From KO/Office
New address for Joanne Ghahremani
SMTP (Internet) ghahrej@reston.btna.com
X.400 address /c=us/a=mci/p=btna/g=joanne/s=ghahremani
Please make necessary changes.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Message From KO/Office
Author: mark.hughes@ccamatil.com at INTERNET
Date: 5/23/96 5:46 PM
Peter,
E-mail and EDI only differ in that the content of one is
person-to-person unstructured and the content of the other is
application-to-application structured. But as far as addressing and
comms and encryption goes, they're the same beast.
Requirements for security/encryption for person-to-person are the
same as application-to-application from a business point of view. I
need privacy, authentication, non-repudiation, integrity, etc for
both types of communication.
So my preferred solution is to take an outgoing message from my EDI
Translation application, give it to my e-mail application which then
applies for that Trading Partner the same encryption as my
person-to-person emails to a human at that Trading Partner, and it
then sends the EDI message as a standard email.
When I receive a message from my Trading Partner (EDI or E-mail) my
e-mail application decrypts them using the same algorithm. The
stuff that is addressed to mark.hughes@ccamatil.com is read by me.
The stuff that is addressed to edi@ccamatil.com is automatically
re-directed to my translator and handled there. Doesn't seem too
complex a concept to me.
EDI and e-mail are both the same. The fact that trad-EDI is all
sent using proprietary addressing over proprietary VANs is part of
the problem, Peter, not part of the solution.
Regards, Mark
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Message From : HUGHES, MARK *
* Location : AUSTRALIA-CCA HDQ *
* KOMAIL ID : N17503 (CCAMCQN1) *
* Date and Time: 05/24/96 07:25:41 *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *