Re: ISA and GS - Unnecessary?

[Tom Darling <tdarling@xxxxxxxxxx>]

At 01:04 PM 6/7/96 -0400, you wrote:

>Yes, I am chair of X12C-TG1, which is the group within X12C (communications) 
>that is developing the proposal for an alternative ISA-IEA structure. Did you 
>have a question? Any suggestions or Internet participation is welcome.

Kit,

  Thanks for dropping in. Although in Atlanta, I arrived at the open session
on the ISA just as it was ending [other business] :(

  What I heard is that instead of changing the ISA the task group /
subcommittee may create one or more new (alternative) interchange envelopes?
Could you provide a brief brief of the open session and its appraisal at
subsequent X12C/TG1 meets for us. I'm sure we'd all be most appreciative.

  Regarding Internet participation, are you folks active on a DISA listserve?

Best regards,
Tom

***************************************************************
* Thomas A. Darling, PhD | <http://www.albany.net/~tdarling>  *
* (518) 443-5001 (w)     | <mailto://tdarling@albany.net>     *
*-------------------------------------------------------------*
*    "Contrariwise," continued Tweedledee, "if it was so,     *
*       it might be; and if it were so, it would be;          *
*         but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic."           *
***************************************************************