Re: AS#1 draft-ietf-ediint-as1-01.txt comments

[Mats Jansson <mjansson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

The first would be the two step process, and I think it's what we
agreed to.

Mats

At 04:22 PM 10/31/96 -0600, Rik Drummond wrote:
>Are we saying?
>
>        Message:== smtpHeader+rfc1847(mime(data),signature(mic))
>
>
>Or
>
>        Message:==smtpHeader+rfc1847(mime(data))+signature(mic)
>
>
>The first is the standard as stated in the rfc1847, with the mic computed
>over the mime(data) structure.
>
>
>The second is one in which the mic is computed over the rfc1847 headers
>also...this is non standard and I would not know how to package it for
>transmission.
>
>
>I hope we are doing the first and not the second!
>
>Later..Rik
>
>------------------------------------------------------
>|         Rik Drummond - The Drummond Group          |
>|   5008 Brentwood Ct., Ft. Worth, TX 76132   USA    |
>|      Voice: 817 294 7339    Fax: 817 294 7950      |
>------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>