Re: !!!! EDIINT AS#2 - Requirement Voting

["Eric D. Williams" <eric_williams@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yeah remember TUBA/CLNP SIPP questionaires and comparisons, et. al.?

Eric Williams, Pres.           http://infobro.com/Black/InfoBro1.htm 
Information Brokers, Inc.     Phone: +1 202.678.5377
http://www.infobro.com/         Fax: +1 301.441.1116
e-mail:eric@infobro.com        Info: info@infobro.com


----------
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
To: Rik Drummond <drummond@onramp.net>
Cc: ietf-ediint@imc.org
Subject: Re: !!!! EDIINT AS#2 - Requirement Voting
Date: Tuesday, November 12, 1996 11:32 PM

At 8:00 PM -0800 11/12/96, Rik Drummond wrote:
>Below is the list of requirements we gathered during the last three months
>for WEB (server based / process-to-process / not SMTP based) EDI
exchanges.
>Now it is time to decide if they are "Requirements" or "Nice to haves".
Let
>vote using the following format.

	Rik,

	The IETF doesn't have voting.  Voting requires membership and the
IETF doesn't have membership.  Voting requires precision.  Can't have THAT!

	The closes the IETF comes to voting is straw polls, to look for
strong consensus.  Another problem with voting is deciding what percentage
wins.

	How are you going to evaluate the tabulations?

	I should also caution you against an assessment questionnaire that
is this complicated.  The odds that folks will mis-complete the form are
very high.

d/

--------------------
Dave Crocker                                             +1 408 246 8253
Brandenburg Consulting                              fax: +1 408 249 6205
675 Spruce Dr.                                  dcrocker@brandenburg.com
Sunnyvale CA 94086 USA                        http://www.brandenburg.com

Internet Mail Consortium                http://www.imc.org, info@imc.org

----------