[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AS#2 - Internet Draft Proposal - 0/3
I am a bit confused. The charter of the Work Group was supposed to be
> Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 10:07:54 -0500
> From: drummond@onramp.net (Rik Drummond)
> Subject: EDIINT WorkGroup Charter Approved
<snip>
> Deliverables:
> -------------
> The group will produce three documents:
> 1) an Informational document describing the requirements
> for interoperable EDI, with sufficient background
> material to give an explanation for the EDI community
> of the Internet-related issues.
> 2) a Applicability Statement describing how current
^^^^^^^
> Internet standards can be used to achieve this
> functionality for MIME and SMTP.
> 3) a Applicability Statement describing how current
^^^^^^^
> Internet standards can be used to achieve this
> functionality for FTP and HTTP.
<snip>
It was again reminded:
> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 08:57:51 -0500
> From: drummond@onramp.net (Rik Drummond)
> Subject: Re: AS#2 Transport Protocol/Security
> I think everyone remember this, but just in case...our workgroup's charter
> is to recommend a mix of existing standards that will facilitate EDI
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> interoperability over Internet.....We should not be inventing additional
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> standards...we may have to ask for adjustments to some...however....
^^^^^^^^^
Now we have
> PRPOSAL / PROPOSAL / PROPOSAL / PROPOSAL / PROPOSAL / PROPOSAL
>
> INTERNET DRAFT Kent Schwab, Actra
>
> 05 December, 1996
>
> Electronic Commerce Transfer Protocol (ECTP)
<snip>
> If we agree we should proceed, then we will discuss in detail the proposal.
> Please don't discuss detail now.
Did I miss something ? If that was the agenda then some of Carl's
ideas could be useful. Do we have time to debate this over Xmas periods ?
David Chia,
RMIT University