[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Device Capabilities

To: Richard Shockey <rshockey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Device Capabilities
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 May 1997 16:03:35 -0400
Cc: Dan Wing <dwing@xxxxxxxxx>, ietf-fax@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-fax@xxxxxxx

At 2:31 PM -0700 5/16/97, Richard Shockey wrote:
>Or worse everyone uses a "Least Common Denominator"

	In spite of the obvious and real limitations of LCD, it is the
basis for successful open systems interopability.

>Mr. Lake may be on to something by putting this into a vCard .. his example
>looked pretty simple to implement.

	As has been noted, the real problem with reliance upon capabilities
passing is keeping the information up to date.

d/

--------------------
Dave Crocker                                             +1 408 246 8253
Brandenburg Consulting                              fax: +1 408 249 6205
675 Spruce Dr.                                  dcrocker@brandenburg.com
Sunnyvale CA 94086 USA                        http://www.brandenburg.com

Internet Mail Consortium                http://www.imc.org, info@imc.org

References:
- Device Capabilities
  - From: Dan Wing
- Re: Device Capabilities
  - From: Richard Shockey

Prev by Date: addressing, replies, variability
Next by Date: Re: two reasons not to use vcard for fax recipient capabilities
Previous by thread: Re: Device Capabilities
Next by thread: Re: Device Capabilities
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread