Archive of ietf-fax/archive1, by thread
Go to date index
Go to main page for ietf-fax/archive1
Page 1 of 3
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
- AOL is Consumer Duty ISP,
Ken Camarro
- FYI - Current Internet Fax Providers,
Richard Shockey
- Re: Message Encapsulation,
Ken Camarro
- Private QP-like encoding of binary messages,
Dan Wing
- internet fax network for your information,
Krishnan J Iyer
- Re: two reasons not to use vcard for fax recipient capabilities??,
Dave Crocker
- Pigeon update,
Mike Lake
- Mailing List Exploders,
Dan Wing
- Light-hearted view of Internet fax,
Mike Lake
- Email Over Facsimile, Adobe/Microsoft OpenType Font Spec,
Ken Camarro
- addressing, replies, variability,
Dave Crocker
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: addressing, replies, variability,
Graham Klyne
- Re: addressing, replies, variability,
Mike Lake
- Re: addressing, replies, variability,
Mike Lake
- RE: addressing, replies, variability,
Herman R. Silbiger
- Re: addressing, replies, variability,
Graham Klyne
- Re: addressing, replies, variability,
Mike Lake
- RE: addressing, replies, variability,
Graham Klyne
- RE: addressing, replies, variability,
Herman R. Silbiger
- Re[2]: addressing, replies, variability,
greg.vaudreuil
- Re[2]: addressing, replies, variability,
Robert A. Rosenberg
- Re: Re[2]: addressing, replies, variability,
Ned Freed
- Re: Re[2]: addressing, replies, variability,
Robert A. Rosenberg
- Re: Re[2]: addressing, replies, variability,
Ned Freed
- Re: Re[2]: addressing, replies, variability,
Robert A. Rosenberg
- Re: Re[2]: addressing, replies, variability,
Ned Freed
- More: vCard,
Richard Shockey
- Procedure for registering content-type,
Mike Lake
- Update to draft propoal for Internet fax,
Mike Lake
- Updated TIFF-F Draft - draft-ietf-fax-tiff-02,
James Rafferty
- CHAIR: Issuing F / Standardizing FX,
Dave Crocker
- Addressing, Session, Message, SMTP, ESMTP, Vcards, UK proposals,
Charles Kline
- Device Capabilities,
Dan Wing
- DSNs if RCPT TO:<faxto@host>,
Dan Wing
- DSNs and MDNs,
Dan Wing
- WIDE etc.,
Mike Lake
- RE: More on Gizmos,
Dan Wing
- Problems with "bounce" to a legacy fax via PSTN,
Charles Kline
- Re: Addressing considerations - processing of errors,
Dan Wing
- I-D ACTION-draft-ietf-fax-t,
Frank Smith
- Re: message & sender authentication (based on market need),
Dan Wing
- Re: two reasons not to use vcard for fax recipient capabilities,
Mike Lake
- Re: two reasons not to use vcard for fax recipient capabilities,
Larry Masinter
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: two reasons not to use vcard for fax recipient capabilities,
Graham Klyne
- Re: two reasons not to use vcard for fax recipient capabilities,
Richard Shockey
- Re: two reasons not to use vcard for fax recipient capabilities,
Dan Wing
- Re: two reasons not to use vcard for fax recipient capabilities,
Graham Klyne
- Re: two reasons not to use vcard for fax recipient capabilities,
Dan Wing
- Re: two reasons not to use vcard for fax recipient capabilities,
Mike Lake
- Re: two reasons not to use vcard for fax recipient capabilities,
Mike Lake
- Re: two reasons not to use vcard for fax recipient capabilities,
James Rafferty
- Re: two reasons not to use vcard for fax recipient capabilities,
Dan Wing
- Re: two reasons not to use vcard for fax recipient capabilities,
Mike Lake
- Re: two reasons not to use vcard for fax recipient capabilities,
Mike Lake
- Re: two reasons not to use vcard for fax recipient capabilities,
Mike Lake
- Re: two reasons not to use vcard for fax recipient capabilities,
Richard Shockey
- Re: two reasons not to use vcard for fax recipient capabilities,
Mike Lake
- Need for a consistent format for both session, and store and forward fax,
Charles Kline
- S&F faster than session-based Internet fax?,
Mike Lake
- Re: S&F faster than session-based Internet fax?,
Elazar (Azi) Ronen
- Re: S&F faster than session-based Internet fax?,
Robert A. Rosenberg
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: S&F faster than session-based Internet fax?,
Neil Joffe
- Re: S&F faster than session-based Internet fax?,
Mike Lake
- Re: S&F faster than session-based Internet fax?,
Mike Lake
- Re: S&F faster than session-based Internet fax?,
Richard Shockey
- Re: S&F faster than session-based Internet fax?,
Mike Lake
- Re: S&F faster than session-based Internet fax?,
Mike Lake
- Re: S&F faster than session-based Internet fax?,
Mike Lake
- Re: S&F faster than session-based Internet fax?,
Dan Wing
- VPIM and fax formats,
Mike Lake
- Re: Fax vs. Telephone Answering Machines?,
Glenn Parsons
- +numberfax@domain,
Ken Camarro
- Re: CHAIR QUERY (was RE: Baseline fax specification needed now!),
Dan Wing
- Precedence For Formalizing Legacy T.30 Specifiractions,
Ken Camarro
- Sender pays Ifax Charges,
Ken Camarro
- Use of vCards for Internet fax - correction,
Mike Lake
- Use of vCard for Internet fax,
Mike Lake
- Real time fax,
Mike Lake
- Vcard,
Richard Shockey
- Standards v implementation,
Mike Lake
- Re: Standards v implementation,
Robert A. Rosenberg
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Standards v implementation,
Mike Lake
- Re: Standards v implementation,
Mike Lake
- Re: Standards v implementation,
Mike Lake
- Re: Standards v implementation,
Robert A. Rosenberg
- Re: Standards v implementation,
Dan Wing
- Re: Standards v implementation,
Robert A. Rosenberg
- Re: Standards v implementation,
Mike Lake
- Re: Standards v implementation,
Dan Wing
- Re: Standards v implementation,
Dan Wing
- Re: Standards v implementation,
Dan Wing
- Re: Standards v implementation,
Dan Wing
- Re: Standards v implementation,
Dan Wing
- Re: Standards v implementation,
Dan Wing
- RE: Encapsulated Fax Transaction for Internet fax,
Herman R. Silbiger
- Question,
Luis Alberto Caceres
- EFT: Encapsulated Fax Transaction for Internet fax,
Mike Lake
- TCP/IP in a chip?,
Mike Lake
- Real Time Fax Over IP: What It Takes,
dduehren
- Content Negotiation (was voice machine bashing),
greg.vaudreuil
- Ietf-fax Modem Quartet, Opus 56?,
Ken Camarro
- Clarification of Elegant,
Ken Camarro
- How Does Session Fax Circuit Work?,
Ken Camarro
- Internet fax, Integrated Messaging Terminals etc.,
Mike Lake
- TIFF-F / TIFF-Fx,
Mike Lake
- drafts of fax addressing status,
Claudio Allocchio, +39 40 3758523
- Addressing considerations,
Herman R. Silbiger
- FW: Announcement,
Herman R. Silbiger
- Slavery to the fax numbers,
Mark R. Lindsey
- Rationale for efax = 12033310470#1234@domain is Elegant,
Ken Camarro
- FullFaxNumber#ext@domain Is Elegant,
Ken Camarro
- Re: Format of Fax Address,
Mike Lake
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Format of Fax Address,
Graham Klyne
- Re: Format of Fax Address,
Dan Wing
- Re: Format of Fax Address,
Dan Wing
- Re: Format of Fax Address,
Graham Klyne
- Re: Format of Fax Address,
Mike Lake
- Re: Format of Fax Address,
Dan Wing
- Re: Format of Fax Address,
Dan Wing
- Re: Format of Fax Address,
Daniel C. Newman
- Re: Format of Fax Address,
Graham Klyne
- Re: Format of Fax Address,
Mike Lake
- RE: Format of Fax Address,
Herman R. Silbiger
- Re: Format of Fax Address,
Dan Wing
- Re: Format of Fax Address,
Mike Lake
- Re: Format of Fax Address,
Robert A. Rosenberg
- Re: Format of Fax Address,
James Rafferty
- ITU reflector for Internet Fax discussions,
Mike Lake
- Fax Addressing,
Vance Shipley
- Fax vs. Telephone Answering Machines,
Larry Masinter
- TIFF-F document required now,
Vance Shipley
- Baseline fax specification needed now!,
greg.vaudreuil
- Ietf-fax List is Great,
Ken Camarro
- Decision making process,
Mike Lake
- TIFF-F,
Doug Murray
- Final Minutes - Internet Fax WG 4/10/97 (re-send),
James Rafferty
- RE: More on Phone Numbers,
Toby Nixon
- RE: Lowest common denominator ...,
Cancio,Vivian
- RE: Addressing,
Herman R. Silbiger
- RE: Phone Numbers,
Herman R. Silbiger
- Internet Fax Format,
Ken Camarro
- Updated Minutes of Memphis ietf fax WG meeting,
James Rafferty
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-fax-tiff-01.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Fax Session Requirements; Real-Time vs. Session,
dduehren
- Internet Facsimile Format as a Default Internet Printer Format,
Ken Camarro
- Session mode concerns,
Graham Klyne
- Session Fax Line Busy?,
Ken Camarro
- Re: ESMTP proposal is valuable ...,
Cancio,Vivian
- Session mode mail spoolers,
Graham Klyne
- Re: Session mode mail spoolers,
Richard Shockey
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Session mode mail spoolers,
Dan Wing
- Re: Session mode mail spoolers,
Dan Wing
- Re: Session mode mail spoolers,
Mike Lake
- Re: Session mode mail spoolers,
Mike Lake
- Re: Session mode mail spoolers,
Dan Wing
- Re: Session mode mail spoolers,
Mike Lake
- Re: Session mode mail spoolers,
Dan Wing
- Re: Session mode mail spoolers,
Mike Lake
- Re: Session mode mail spoolers,
Graham Klyne
- Re: Session mode mail spoolers,
George Pajari
- Re: Session mode mail spoolers,
Dan Wing
- Re: Session mode mail spoolers,
Graham Klyne
- Re: S&F vs. Real Time ; SMTP vs Email,
Neil Joffe
- Re: S&F vs. Real Time ; SMTP vs Email,
Robert A. Rosenberg
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: S&F vs. Real Time ; SMTP vs Email,
Herman R. Silbiger
- Re: S&F vs. Real Time ; SMTP vs Email,
Mike Lake
- Re: S&F vs. Real Time ; SMTP vs Email,
Mike Lake
- RE: S&F vs. Real Time ; SMTP vs Email,
Mike Lake
- RE: S&F vs. Real Time ; SMTP vs Email,
Mike Lake
- Re[2]: S&F vs. Real Time ; SMTP vs Email,
Steve Meyer
- Re: Re[2]: S&F vs. Real Time ; SMTP vs Email,
Mike Lake
- RE: S&F vs. Real Time ; SMTP vs Email,
Mike Lake
- Re[2]: S&F vs. Real Time ; SMTP vs Email,
Steve Meyer
- Re: Fw: S&F vs. Real Time ; SMTP vs Email,
Mike Lake
- Re: Fw: S&F vs. Real Time ; SMTP vs Email,
Mike Lake
- Re: Fw: S&F vs. Real Time ; SMTP vs Email,
Robert A. Rosenberg
- Edited version of Internet Fax WG Minutes,
James Rafferty
- Re: comments by Wendell Bishop,
Charles Kline
- re:revised minutes of IETF FAX WG?,
Glenn Parsons
- Re: revised minutes of IETF FAX WG (still in DRAFT form),
James Rafferty
- revised minutes of IETF FAX WG,
Larry Masinter
- draft-ietf-fax-transport-00,
NJoffe
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: draft-ietf-fax-transport-00,
Wendell_Bishop
- Re: draft-ietf-fax-transport-00,
Dan Wing
- RE: draft-ietf-fax-transport-00,
Herman R. Silbiger
- RE: draft-ietf-fax-transport-00,
Dan Wing
- FW: draft-ietf-fax-transport-00,
Vance Shipley
- Re: draft-ietf-fax-transport-00,
Clark,Cindy
- Re: FW: draft-ietf-fax-transport-00,
george.mount
- Re[2]: draft-ietf-fax-transport-00,
Neil Joffe
- RE: draft-ietf-fax-transport-00,
Herman R. Silbiger
- RE: draft-ietf-fax-transport-00,
Graham Klyne
- Re: Re[2]: draft-ietf-fax-transport-00,
Mike Lake
- Beginner's Curiosities,
Wongyu Cho
- Capabilities in image files,
Wendell_Bishop
- Internet Facsimile and Gateway Addressing,
Ken Camarro
- Fax addressing requirements,
Graham Klyne
- TIFF-F and TIFF-FX,
Glenn Parsons
- Re: Addressing and SMTP,
George Pajari
- PDFs and a Voice From The Past,
Ken Camarro
- PDF and fax,
Nick Gault
- PDF and TWAIN,
Ken Camarro
- Short Summary of Internet Fax WG Memphis meeting,
James Rafferty
- DRAFT minutes of IETF-FAX working group meeting today,
Larry Masinter
- Comments on draft-ietf-fax-tiff-00.txt,
Steve Zilles
- Specification of fax resolution in draft TIFF-F,
Herman R. Silbiger
Page 1 of 3
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail
Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections
to this Web page, please send them to
phoffman@imc.org.