[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: AD review comments on
At 10:55 PM 9/26/02 -0700, ned.freed@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
This suggests a possible approach of simply pulling all the problematic
MTA-to-UA stuff from the draft, and simply focusing on timely delivery (in
the original email sense).
Doesn't that beg the question of how this mechanism differs from
from the original DELIVERBY extension?
I think I know (roughly) the answer, but will respond differently.
I think such differences would rapidly surface from the above mooted
approach. TIMELY is consciously built on DELIVERBY, and uses existing
DELIVERBY mechanisms to the maximum extent possible. So, if after pulling
the MTA-to-UA stuff there's nothing left, we simply say "use
DELIVERBY". Job done.