[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IESG Review: draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-10.txt

To: Claudio Allocchio <Claudio.Allocchio@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IESG Review: draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-10.txt
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 10:56:56 -0400
Cc: ietf-fax@xxxxxxx, Scott Hollenbeck <sah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hiroshi Tamura <tamura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-fax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-fax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-fax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
References: <>
Reply-to: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-fax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Claudio,

CA> after some discussion, the IESG believes that 
CA> draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-10.txt should include a small section which
CA> describes the scenario where CONNEG can be used, and cases where this
CA> could not apply, i.e. some sort of applicability statement.


I just realized that you are citing this as a formal IESG requirement.

Would you please forward to the list the text of the formal IESG
directive?

Thanks.

d/
--
 Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
 Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>

References:
- IESG Review: draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-10.txt
  - From: Claudio Allocchio

Prev by Date: Re: draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-10.txt
Next by Date: Out of Office AutoReply: <Possible SPAM> Important
Previous by thread: Re: IESG Review: draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-10.txt
Next by thread: FW: review of draft-ietf-fax-ffpim-05.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread