[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Case sensitivity on the LHS
> If we simplify IMAA to make the LHS case-insensitive, it will
> probably match the expectations of users better. It would also mean
> that we could reuse Nameprep instead of using our own Stringprep
> profile. There are other reasons why this might be good listed in the
> IMAA document. But to do so would go against the spirit of the
> standards on which IMAA rests, namely 2821 and 2822 (and 821 and 822
> before them).
> Purity or modernity?
Modernity. I agree that case insensitivity will probably match the
expectations of users better.
Is this document intended to be a formal update to 2821 and 2822? Both
(2821 section 4.1.2 and 2822 section 3.4.1) contain formal definitions of
the local part of an email address.