[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Barry Leiba wrote:
- section 6: should we restrict selection options to be simple atoms
as we have in this draft, or should we allow for them to be a list as
well? I'm thinking that some future selection option might take one
or more arguments. For example, the non-standard SCAN extension used
by Pine and UW-IMAP could be reworked to look something like this:
x LIST ((SCAN "foo")) "" "bar/%"
or better yet:
x LIST ((SCAN "utf-8" "foo")) "" "bar/%"
Since I think it adds too much complexity, unless there's some support
of Ken's suggestion Very Soon, I will toss the idea, and buy Ken a glass
of Bordeaux in Paris as compensation.
It was just a thought, since I was thinking about Mark's SCAN extension
at the time. I won't be devastated if we leave things alone.
Unfortunately, I won't be in Paris, and the compensation wouldn't be
necessary anyways. :)
Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer 21 Princeton Place
716-662-8973 x26 Orchard Park, NY 14127
--PGP Public Key-- http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp