[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MODSEQ in CONDSTORE

To: Dave Cridland <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: MODSEQ in CONDSTORE
From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 14:32:50 -0800
Cc: Mark Crispin <mrc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ietf-imapext@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-imapext/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-imapext.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-imapext-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-imapext@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Dave said "the deficient server in this case causes no damage other than a spurious round-trip from a client.", and Mark said something about guns and preschoolers :)

Were you two talking about different cases? Would the outcome of bad client use of MODSEQ would be dire or simply the client's own problem?

lisa

Follow-Ups:
- Re: MODSEQ in CONDSTORE
  - From: Dave Cridland
- Re: MODSEQ in CONDSTORE
  - From: Mark Crispin

References:
- MODSEQ in CONDSTORE
  - From: Mark Crispin
- Re: MODSEQ in CONDSTORE
  - From: Dave Cridland
- Re: MODSEQ in CONDSTORE
  - From: Mark Crispin
- Re: MODSEQ in CONDSTORE
  - From: Dave Cridland
- Re: MODSEQ in CONDSTORE
  - From: Mark Crispin
- Re: MODSEQ in CONDSTORE
  - From: Dave Cridland
- Re: MODSEQ in CONDSTORE
  - From: Mark Crispin
- Re: MODSEQ in CONDSTORE
  - From: Dave Cridland

Prev by Date: Re: MODSEQ in CONDSTORE
Next by Date: Re: MODSEQ in CONDSTORE
Previous by thread: Re: MODSEQ in CONDSTORE
Next by thread: Re: MODSEQ in CONDSTORE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread