Hi Alexey,--On November 13, 2006 7:19:08 PM +0000 Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Arnt has reminded me that I've promised to publish the POSTADDRESS document once the LIST-EXTENDED is done. Now is the time. Lisa would like to see more reviews of the document before requesting IETF LC. It would also be great to know who is interested in implementing this extension. I know of 2 server and 1 client implementation: Server: Isode Oryx Client: Polymer
This is more of a generic question, but when should items like this be METADATA as opposed to a LISTEXT item? To me, POSTADDRESS really feels like a property of the mailbox as opposed to a property of the mailstore. I see LISTEXT items as mailstore properties (e.g., one mailbox is a child of another) and METADATA as mailbox properties. So I would prefer to see this as a METADATA item. Plus its MUCH easier to extend using METADATA than LISTEXT - you just register a new entry - its not a whole new extension, with a new CAPABILITY etc.
Also, with forward-without-download I question the utility of an 'fcc' mechanism.
-- Cyrus Daboo