[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Review of sort


On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Mark Crispin wrote:
I have just posted (and cc'd to the imapext list) sort draft -18 which I believe addresses Cyrus' review points and also addresses all the current idnits except for page breaks.
Hmm, it still has this impossible to implement requirement on ordering of sibling in step 6 of the THREAD=REFERENCES algorithm: 
         In the case of an exact match on
         sent date or if either of the Date: headers used in a
         comparison can not be parsed, use the order in which the
         messages appear in the mailbox (that is, by sequence number) to
         determine the order.
I thought that was going to be changed to specify that if the Date: header field is invalid then the INTERNALDATE should be used instead. (Didn't you say that was what UW-imapd actually did?) 



I suspect that should be i;ascii-casemap instead of en;ascii-casemap.


Yes.  en;ascii-casemap was renamed back to i;ascii-casemap.


...

  Its equality, ordering and substring operations are as for i;octet,
  except that first, all pre-composed Unicode characters are fully
  decomposed; and second, all characters which have a title case are
  changed to their title case.


Can you explain the choice of titlecase?


Philip Guenther