[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: we all refer to LISTEXT as LISTEXT

To: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: we all refer to LISTEXT as LISTEXT
From: Ken Murchison <murch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:34:37 -0500
Cc: ietf-imapext@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <hqw6HDpVsNAF4+OpaZWhtQ.md5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-imapext/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-imapext.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-imapext-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon University
References: <200611211403.12916.martin.konold@xxxxxxxxxxx> <BnLUz+OOPWg2Iuae01CAug.md5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <hqw6HDpVsNAF4+OpaZWhtQ.md5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-imapext@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060913)


Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:

So maybe the final RFC should name the capability LISTEXT, too. We referto all the other extensions by their capability name, and we don't seemto like the name LIST-EXTENDED...

The capability used to be LISTEXT, but it was changed when the syntaxwas changed dramatically, since there was some deployment of the olderdrafts.


--
Kenneth Murchison
Systems Programmer
Project Cyrus Developer/Maintainer
Carnegie Mellon University

References:
- we all refer to LISTEXT as LISTEXT
  - From: Arnt Gulbrandsen

Prev by Date: Re: we all refer to LISTEXT as LISTEXT
Next by Date: Re: Review of sort
Previous by thread: Re: we all refer to LISTEXT as LISTEXT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread