[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IDLEPLUS extension

To: Dan Karp <dkarp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IDLEPLUS extension
From: Martin Konold <martin.konold@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:18:32 +0100
Cc: IMAP Extensions WG <ietf-imapext@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <789899155.132211164070881212.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-imapext/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-imapext.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-imapext-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: erfrakon
References: <789899155.132211164070881212.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-imapext@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.5

Am Dienstag, 21. November 2006 02:01 schrieb Dan Karp:

Hi Dan,

> Message sequence numbers are meaningless -- and probably can't be
> determined -- in non-SELECTed mailboxes.  You'd be better off using UIDs
> qualified by UIDVALIDITY.

Thank you for your valuable feedback!

Yes, I agree even though it requires some extra bytes but only the triple 
(name/uidvalidity/uid) is really very robust and not prone to race 
conditions. I changed the draft accordingly.

http://www.erfrakon.de/konold/draft-konold-imap-idleplus-03.txt

Yours,
-- martin

-- 
http://www.erfrakon.com/
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker

References:
- Re: IDLEPLUS extension
  - From: Dan Karp

Prev by Date: Re: Review of sort
Next by Date: Re: Review of sort
Previous by thread: Re: IDLEPLUS extension
Next by thread: Re: IDLEPLUS extension
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread