Re: we all refer to LISTEXT as LISTEXT

[Martin Konold <martin.konold@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Am Mittwoch, 22. November 2006 13:40 schrieb Alexey Melnikov:
> Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> > So maybe the final RFC should name the capability LISTEXT, too. We
> > refer to all the other extensions by their capability name, and we
> > don't seem to like the name LIST-EXTENDED...
>
> Communigate also advertises LISTEXT, while supporting a version which is
> not compatible with the one implemented by Cyrus.

The implementation in Cyrus is explicitly using LIST-EXTENDED because my 
original patch allowed to have both around at the same time. 

Only later it was decided that the support for the out-dated LISTEXT is to be 
dropped.

> So I don't think we can use LISTEXT as a capability for the approved draft.

I second this.

Yours,
-- martin

-- 
http://www.erfrakon.com/
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker