Mark Crispin writes:
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Cyrus Daboo wrote:I agree that i;unicode-casemap cannot go in the comparator draft as its already been approved and on its way. There is too much else that depends on it to delay any more. A new draft defining and registering the new collation is best right now.OK, I'm convinced. I'll write the document.
Fine.
Please point me to the appropriate thing that I should use as a framework for the document, so that I don't have to guess and guess wrong.My intent is to use the definition of i;ascii-casemap as a basis, which presumably means I should use the comparator draft.
Sounds good.
Unless you think I should use i;basic instead.
Almost as good. Arnt