Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review

[Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@xxxxxxxx>]

Arnt Gulbrandsen writes:
> Arnt Gulbrandsen writes:
> > Ken Murchison writes:
> > > - Section 3.4, first paragraph.  I don't really like the MUST and 
> > > MUST NOT combination in the two sentences.  Could they be merged 
> > > into one positive sentence something like the following?
> > >
> > >     If the server supports the IMAP4 NAMESPACE command [4], and
> > >     it is in the authenticated state, the server MUST return an
> > >     untagged NAMESPACE response when a language is negotiated.
> >
> > Good suggestion. Will do.
>
> But how, exactly? I could say one of the following:

Or 4. All LANGUAGE-using clients MUST be able to parse the LANGUAGE 
response, whether they care about it or not.

Arnt