[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review

To: Ken Murchison <murch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review
From: Mark Crispin <MRC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:34:15 -0800
Cc: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@xxxxxxxx>, ietf-imapext@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <456C635D.2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-imapext/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-imapext.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-imapext-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: Networks & Distributed Computing
References: <455C6C2D.3000004@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <vskXepwcMqcLVhJuZdFRqw.md5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cejUghrP6R0/G2i0yt502Q.md5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <456C635D.2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-imapext@xxxxxxxxxxxx


+1

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Ken Murchison wrote:

I'm fine with 1 or 2. As a server guy, I don't care if we send unsolicitedNAMESPACE responses after LANGUAGE or we require the client to issueNAMESPACE after LANGUAGE. The former saves a roundtrip and the latter issimilar to CAPABILITY after STARTTLS/AUTHENTICATE.


-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.

References:
- LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review
  - From: Ken Murchison
- Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review
  - From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review
  - From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review
  - From: Ken Murchison

Prev by Date: Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review
Next by Date: Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review
Previous by thread: Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review
Next by thread: Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread