[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review

To: ietf-imapext@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 20:29:33 +0100
Cc: Mark Crispin <mrc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <alpine.WNT.0.8.0611280853060.4772@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-imapext/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-imapext.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-imapext-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <455C6C2D.3000004@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <vskXepwcMqcLVhJuZdFRqw.md5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cejUghrP6R0/G2i0yt502Q.md5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <456C6840.5020804@xxxxxxxxx> <alpine.WNT.0.8.0611280853060.4772@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-imapext@xxxxxxxxxxxx


Mark Crispin writes:

It wouldn't hurt to make LANGUAGE require NAMESPACE.

I did so now. The obvious best choice. Can't imagine why I didn't thinkof that long ago.


Arnt

References:
- LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review
  - From: Ken Murchison
- Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review
  - From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review
  - From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review
  - From: Alexey Melnikov
- Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review
  - From: Mark Crispin

Prev by Date: Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review
Next by Date: Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review
Previous by thread: Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review
Next by thread: Re: LANGUAGE/COMPARATOR review
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread