On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 11:29 -0800, Mark Crispin wrote: > > Should the original parent/child link be broken if adding the new one > > would introduce a loop? I think this should be clarified in the text. > > It doesn't say that that should be done; therefore it is not done. I think it's ambiguous. And now it's even more ambiguous because you say it shouldn't be broken, but your implementation breaks it.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part