Re: Tim Polk's DISCUSS on draft-ietf-imapext-i18n-15.txt

[Mark Crispin <MRC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> Mark Crispin writes:
> > Can't we do an end run by stating that an implementation of the LANGUAGE 
> > extension MUST allow at least one language other than i-default?
> Isn't that what Tim suggests?

I think so, but I haven't kept close enough track.

-- Mark --

http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.