[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tim Polk's DISCUSS on draft-ietf-imapext-i18n-15.txt
On Tue Mar 4 18:52:20 2008, Mark Crispin wrote:
Can someone explain to me why the LANGUAGE extension is be offered
at all if i-default is the only defined extension? Can't we do an
end run by stating that an implementation of the LANGUAGE extension
MUST allow at least one language other than i-default?
I have no sympathy for implementions that want to "support
LANGUAGE" as a checklist item, yet not actually implement any
+1 - I wasn't thinking about semantics, only syntax.
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx - xmpp:dwd@xxxxxxxxxx
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade